Difference between revisions of "Documentation Talk:Reference Section 4"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Valera (Talk) to last revision by Jholsenback) |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
: The issue of new images is something that's been raised before (other sections) ... it's on my list but low priority at the moment --[[User:Jholsenback|jholsenback]] 17:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC) | : The issue of new images is something that's been raised before (other sections) ... it's on my list but low priority at the moment --[[User:Jholsenback|jholsenback]] 17:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 23:56, 28 October 2010
Blob Formula
Better Blob Formula
inline pictures rendered from the portfolio
I know it might seems childish or simple, but even if the graphics illustrations in 2D are nice to explain the measurement (so, keep them), it might be more than a good move to also provide for each shape a sample of render (and we already have them, in the portfolio of povray, section allobjects).
It is pretty obvious what a sphere is, but even the torus had to rely on the donut naming to give everyone a clue. Text is good, but a really rendered shape for each entry (and whose source could be found in the distribution) might really enhance that section.
Actual changes to the pages would be: upload the rendered images from portfolio, add the pictures in the pages.
Some better images could be from the window's povray menu/Insert
- The issue of new images is something that's been raised before (other sections) ... it's on my list but low priority at the moment --jholsenback 17:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC)