Difference between revisions of "User talk:StephenS"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jholsenback (talk | contribs) |
(Added comment.) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Anaglyph (red/cyan) pictures :-) | Anaglyph (red/cyan) pictures :-) | ||
− | That brings up an issue. I've just emailed Chris about the need to come up with a unified approach to dealing with the spam issue. I'm looking at this article about fighting [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Spam_Filter spam] for some guidance. --[[User:Jholsenback|ash]] 13:15, 24 January 2009 (UTC) | + | :That brings up an issue. I've just emailed Chris about the need to come up with a unified approach to dealing with the spam issue. I'm looking at this article about fighting [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Spam_Filter spam] for some guidance. --[[User:Jholsenback|ash]] 13:15, 24 January 2009 (UTC) |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ::Most wikis use a similar policy, which is to make a post on the discussion (talk) page of the page/content you want to delete. If no-one in the community disagrees within several days then it's okay to go ahead and delete the page/content. [[User:Eddie|Eddie]] 14:20, 24 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:20, 24 January 2009
Should wiki cleanup simply delete content or replace with short sentence of why something was deleted?
Oh and I like: Anaglyph (red/cyan) pictures :-)
- That brings up an issue. I've just emailed Chris about the need to come up with a unified approach to dealing with the spam issue. I'm looking at this article about fighting spam for some guidance. --ash 13:15, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- Most wikis use a similar policy, which is to make a post on the discussion (talk) page of the page/content you want to delete. If no-one in the community disagrees within several days then it's okay to go ahead and delete the page/content. Eddie 14:20, 24 January 2009 (UTC)